Entretien oral anglais

[h2k]

Bonjour,

Afin de préparer au mieux et de façon ludique mon entretien d'anglais, je me permets de faire appel à vous : aeroneticiens ; à votre expérience et à vos talents avec la langue de Shakespeare.

Je pense que ce topic pourra également aider tous ceux et toutes celles qui sont actuellement en phase de préparation pour l'english interview
A savoir ceux qui sont actuellement en phase de sélection pour CTC, Netjets, Oxford aviation, Sabena flight Academy, Aeromadrid...

La question étant la suivante : What do you think about the future of commercial airline?

Vos réponses et commentaires pertinents en anglais sont la bienvenue.

Best regards,
Fred

[mokasoka]

hy H2k, Which selection will you pass through?

As i see it , in the next decade , commercial aviation will have to deal with the lessen of CO2 rejection because everyone is concerned with this problem. Next i think widebody aircrafts won't be seen as an efficient solution regarding costs they involve, smaller aircrafts should known a larger success. It's obvious that commercial aviation would be nothing without passengers using it so i expect both manufacturer and airline to offer a large variety of services wich will make the difference in this fast growing market.
We can't avoid to take into consideration the middle east and Asian area. The highest increase would come from there in the next few years. Local airlines have a huge need of both pilots and aircrafts and they must be advised that security mustn't be underestimate if not we'll face to several accidents or maybe catastrophs which may be a disaster for the whole commercial market. Concerning the current two major manufacturer i mean Airbus and Boeing i have an idea on who will win the battle but i would rather say nothing about that and see what others think on the subjet.

Mokasoka , j'espère qu'il n'y a pas trop de grosses fautes , j'ai essayé d'écrire au fil des idées donc..

[kit]

As i see it , in the next decade , commercial aviation will have to deal with the lessen of CO2 rejection because everyone is concerned with this problem.

However, commercial aviation's contibution in CO2 rejection is only 2% these days. The UN estimates that it will be 3% in 50 years from now
A bigger problem might be noise pollution above big cities...

[bifluor]

A bigger problem might be noise pollution above big cities...

I do not think the noise will be a huge problem as people will be able to wear ear plugs.

However the petrol could be a pretty big issue. Indeed experts think in 40 years there will not be any petrol left on this bloody earth.
Hopefully until then all the planes will be double decked. One deck like the ones we know today (first class) and the other one with a row of pedalboards to run the propellers(low cost deck...).

I advice everyone of you to buy a bicycle and shape your legs especially the tighs before you start your ATPL.

Maybe I should create a bicycle company to fund my ATPL

See you

[excelaviation]

Hi,

Here is one interesting subject... I think the Legacy Carriers, as we know them today (United, American, Delta,...) will have to face some heavy restructuring. The growing Southwest Airlines (in the low cost market) is taking over some of those carriers routes. But the question is: what does the publice want? It's been proven now that the large majority want to fly for cheap, and that is why Southwest is so successful (as well as being ranked the Nbr 1 airline in customer satisfaction, United and American and Delta fighting over who's the worst!). The public is ready to sacrifice some comfort for 3 to 5 hours flights, which in the US constitutes a cost to cost. More and more domestic flights are taken over by the regional airline industry, which does the job as well as the major carriers, but for a lot less. Nowadays, when you buy a ticket on United, between Nashville and Denver, the regionals do it. The legacy carriers are turning the domestic market over to the them, whom I think will keep growing. The untouched market left for the major carriers, is the international market. All of those carriers have seen this, and all of them are betting on more destinations, more frequency, and the greater comfort of a larger size cabin.
I think the legacy carriers will prevail, because of a certain immunity on the international market (and let's face it, when United and American serve the same destinations from the same airports, they agree on the fares...). As far a the low cost carriers go, the only way to keep a cost structure down, is to keep the company small. The reason why United (Ted), Delta (Song) failed at the low cost market, is their cost structure being so high, from decades of overpaying employees.
The low cost carriers are bound to emerge and fade away, some will come replace others that disappear. The market will always be there, the companies will be changing.
As far as airplanes go, the Airbus 380 will be a large success, as much as the 747 was in his days. The more passengers in the aircraft, the less the cost per seat mile. Ex: a Canadair Regional Jet has a cost per seat mile of $0.17. While Jetblue operates the Airbus with a cpsm of $0.08. And remember, the general public wants to pay less! But there will always be a part of that same public who will be traveling in business class, or first. This service is what will guaranty those airlines to never have to compete with the low cost on international routes.
And of course there will always be "the only" way to travel, for those who can afford it, is the charter.
This is just my stake on that matter, and any comments will be welcome.
Keep flying people, but do it safe!

[DeborahTuttle]

content is produced and allowed to be printed on the page. The challenges of the site and ukwritings are arranged for simple solutions for humans. The skills are regrouped for certain levels. Dynamics are arranged with the permission of few and vital paths for all people for the future times for humans.