En quoi consiste exactement le biannual review pour un CPL/IFR Single et Multi? En général combien d'heures de ground, y a-t-il de nouveau des tests à passer, combien d'heures de vol, quelles sont les manoeuvres, y a-t-il du simulated instrument ou ceci est fait dans l'expérience récente IFR, faut-il voler également sur un multimoteur.
Au final: Combien ça coute en France? Aux Etats Unis? ça vaut plus le coup de prendre un billet pour les US (quitte à faire quelques HdV en plus histoire de)?
Biannual Review
Modérateur : Big Brother
-
chti71 - Chef de secteur posteur
- Messages : 1546
- Enregistré le : 30 nov. 2003, 01:00
- Localisation : San Antonio Texas
- Âge : 54
FAR Section 61.56 ? Flight Review
a) A flight review consists of a minimum of 1 hour of flight instruction and 1 hour of ground instruction.
The review must include:
1 - A review of the current general operating and flight rules of Part 91 ; and
2 - A review of maneuvers and procedures which, at the discretion of the person giving the review, are necessary for the pilot to demonstrate the safe exercises of the privileges of the pilot certificate.
b) Glider pilots may substitute a minimum of three instructional flights in a glider, each of which includes a 360-degree turn, in lieu of the 1 hour of flight instruction required in paragraph (a) of this section.
c) Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, no person may act as pilot in command of an aircraft unless, since the beginning of the 24th calendar month before the month in which that pilot acts as pilot in command, that person has:
Accomplished a flight review given in an aircraft for which that pilot is rated by an appropriately rated instructor certificated under this part or other person designated by the Administrator; and
A logbook endorsed by the person who gave the review certifying that the person has satisfactorily completed the review.
d) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c ) of this section, satisfactorily completed a pilot proficiency check conducted by the FAA, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege, need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.
e) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c ) of this section, satisfactorily completed one or more phases of an FAA-sponsored pilot proficiency award program need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.
f) A person who holds a current flight instructor certificate who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c ) of this section, satisfactorily completed a renewal of a flight instructor certificate under the provisions of Sec. 61.197 (c ), need not accomplish the 1 hour of ground instruction specified in subparagraph (a) (1) of this section.
g) The requirements of this section may be accomplished in combination with the requirements of Sec. 61.57 and other applicable recency requirements at the discretion of the instructor.
a) A flight review consists of a minimum of 1 hour of flight instruction and 1 hour of ground instruction.
The review must include:
1 - A review of the current general operating and flight rules of Part 91 ; and
2 - A review of maneuvers and procedures which, at the discretion of the person giving the review, are necessary for the pilot to demonstrate the safe exercises of the privileges of the pilot certificate.
b) Glider pilots may substitute a minimum of three instructional flights in a glider, each of which includes a 360-degree turn, in lieu of the 1 hour of flight instruction required in paragraph (a) of this section.
c) Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, no person may act as pilot in command of an aircraft unless, since the beginning of the 24th calendar month before the month in which that pilot acts as pilot in command, that person has:
Accomplished a flight review given in an aircraft for which that pilot is rated by an appropriately rated instructor certificated under this part or other person designated by the Administrator; and
A logbook endorsed by the person who gave the review certifying that the person has satisfactorily completed the review.
d) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c ) of this section, satisfactorily completed a pilot proficiency check conducted by the FAA, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege, need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.
e) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c ) of this section, satisfactorily completed one or more phases of an FAA-sponsored pilot proficiency award program need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.
f) A person who holds a current flight instructor certificate who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c ) of this section, satisfactorily completed a renewal of a flight instructor certificate under the provisions of Sec. 61.197 (c ), need not accomplish the 1 hour of ground instruction specified in subparagraph (a) (1) of this section.
g) The requirements of this section may be accomplished in combination with the requirements of Sec. 61.57 and other applicable recency requirements at the discretion of the instructor.
Fly because you like to, if you are in it for the respect, prestige, recognition or money you may be disappointed.
-
chti71
- Chef de secteur posteur
- Messages : 1546
- Enregistré le : 30 nov. 2003, 01:00
- Localisation : San Antonio Texas
- Âge : 54
En resume ca laisse quand meme une grande marge de maneuvre pour l'instructeur et le pilote.
Ne pas confondre "Flight review" (24 mois)(VFR) et "Instrument Proficiency Check" (12 mois)(IFR).
IL est prudent de faire un "flight review" sur l'avion le plus performant que le pilote est appele a piloter.
Le "flight review" ne prend pas en compte mono ou multi moteur.
Il n'y a pas d'echec lors d'un "flight review"...L'instructeur qui pense que le pilote n'est pas "au niveau" peut, soit recommender plus d'entrainement en double commande, soit simplement ne pas signer le carnet de vol.
Bon vols.
Ne pas confondre "Flight review" (24 mois)(VFR) et "Instrument Proficiency Check" (12 mois)(IFR).
IL est prudent de faire un "flight review" sur l'avion le plus performant que le pilote est appele a piloter.
Le "flight review" ne prend pas en compte mono ou multi moteur.
Il n'y a pas d'echec lors d'un "flight review"...L'instructeur qui pense que le pilote n'est pas "au niveau" peut, soit recommender plus d'entrainement en double commande, soit simplement ne pas signer le carnet de vol.
Bon vols.